(no subject)
Jun. 8th, 2002 09:47 am"DESPERATE DIVORCEES Hunting down mature sluts all over the country"
There's a certain formula to such things, this from an unsolicited e-mail ad for a porn site -- does it really matter which one? -- but it could almost as easily come from the phone sex ads in the Adult section of the newspaper, right next to the pictures of
mishak. It's the somewhat derogatory adjective + plural noun + participle: "Horny sluts waiting (to crawl through your phone)." "Cum-crazed coeds" -- (tangent: you know what bothers me? It is this: people who think "cum into my website" vel sim. constitutes a clever pun) -- "cum-crazed coeds choking" (on your huge veiny patriarchal phallus). And so on. Some of them can be quite artful, little masterpieces constrained by the rules and conventions of the genre, like a well-crafted sonnet or elegiac couplet or Dogme 95 film.
Still, such gems are rare, and it all gets tiresome, eventually. And mishak and margaux deserve better, don't you think?
(Aside: I wondered suddenly if there has been a Dogme 95 porn flick, but rather than simply ask and get mocked by
spriggan, I went to google and found this right away [work safe? well, consider the context]. Although we might point to an apparent violation of rule 10, and, come to think of it, wouldn't a porn flick be a genre film [cf. rule 8]?)
There's a certain formula to such things, this from an unsolicited e-mail ad for a porn site -- does it really matter which one? -- but it could almost as easily come from the phone sex ads in the Adult section of the newspaper, right next to the pictures of
Still, such gems are rare, and it all gets tiresome, eventually. And mishak and margaux deserve better, don't you think?
(Aside: I wondered suddenly if there has been a Dogme 95 porn flick, but rather than simply ask and get mocked by