Necromantic hooters

For those of you who don't already read yuki_onna:

http://www.livejournal.com/users/yuki_onna/92898.html

Work-safe if you can read about breasts.

If you can't, oops!

Logic, or Boudica's torc

1. "I have found a piece of jewelry."

2. "Someone famous from this area was said by a foreign guy writing a century and a half later to have worn this kind of jewelry."

3. "This jewelry must have been hers. QED."

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/story.jsp?story=513627

Still, cool and all that some guy found a missing part of a moderately famous museum piece.

something else by means of which to waste the time

See the last 20 images posted on livejournal. About half quiz graphics, of course, and beware of body parts.

http://www.untimelydeath.com/lj/lj_last_image.html

One of y'all posted this, I think, and I fear I can't remember who it was. Sorry.

Ubiquity of Depp

If I had time, I'd work up a study for Trends in Livejournal Science on the livejournal last-20-images thing I mentioned earlier, and what one may learn from the fact that any group of twenty random images seems very likely to contain:

A picture of Johnny Depp or Angelina Jolie;
A picture of a cat or rabbit;
Anime characters;
Cleavage;
At least two quizzes;
Ninjas;
Cyrillic or Greek writing.

I'm reloading it every so often as I remember, and only once -- *once* -- has there not been a picture of Johnny Depp. If this trend keeps up, nearly 5% of all journal picture posts are of Mr. Depp. He's coming up more often than boobies. And that's not counting journal icons!

Incidentally, yesterday I got an ad for some erectile dysfunction drug or other that claimed Johnny used it.

Yes, I keep posting

But what I have to say is just so darn interesting!

Especially when, as is frequently the case today, all I have to do is just point you to what OTHER people say.

For those who don't read puffpastry:

http://www.livejournal.com/users/puffpastry/67103.html